Tuesday, August 9, 2011

My Favorite Part of the Resurrection Story

The story of the resurrection of Jesus Christ is one of the cornerstones of Christianity.  It is the "good news" of the Gospels.  It is not my intention with this post to delve into the meaning and impact of this story in any kind of general way.  Nor am I going to attempt to unravel the apparent discrepancies between the different Gospel accounts of the story.  Nor am I going to attempt to definitively determine what degree of the story is fact or fiction, or whether it is completely one or the other.  As the ringmaster of this nuclear carnival, I reserve the right to put these matters off until another day, or indefinitely if I choose.  For now, I just want to consider one teeny, tiny little detail of the story.

In the story as it is told in the Gospel of Luke, after his resurrection Jesus appears to the disciples in the rooms where they are staying.  While they were staring at him, hardly believing their own eyes, he simply asks them if they have anything to eat.  Now, there aren't many moments bordering on the cute or the comical to be found anywhere in the Bible, but this always brings a smile to my face.  You can picture the disciples standing there with their eyes wide and their mouths open as Jesus strolls in and asks, "You guys got anything to eat around here.  I'm starving."  And why wouldn't he be?  After all, he hadn't eaten for three days.  Strangely enough, of all the details of the story, this one seems to feel the most authentic to me.  If I were to believe any of it, it would be on the basis of this.

Consider, for a moment, the possibility that the story is entirely fiction.  Some ancient storyteller sits down to make all this up.  He reaches this incredibly significant moment where Jesus returns from the underworld and appears before his disciples.  It would seem to be an occasion for some great revelation, some profound statement, the imparting of some incredible secret about life beyond the grave.  Having him ask for something to eat completely underplays the moment, almost comically.  It seems especially out of character for ancient literature, where the characters were usually towering, and yet quite wooden, archetypes.  They barely ate at all, let alone upon their triumphant return from the grave.  Hercules would have broken up out of the ground on a bull of fire that he had tamed in Hades.  Jesus quietly, calmly asks for a meal.

The moment is so absurdly apropos, that if it is fiction, then it's almost a literary anachronism.  It would be like discovering a painting with linear perspective thousands of years before the Renaissance.  It displays a depth of sensibility, involving a subversion of dramatic effect that would have been completely alien at the time.  It's almost...ironic, ages before writers had the sophistication or self-awareness to be capable of such a thing.  It's such a little detail, and yet so oddly appropriate.

Of course, one could make the argument that the detail is included because they wanted to drive home the point that Jesus' resurrection was a physical one.  They wanted to make the point that he returned in the flesh, not merely in spirit.  I completely agree.  Whether fact or fiction, this is undoubtedly why the detail was included in the story.  But this just goes to demonstrate how revolutionary Jesus was, even as a character in a book.  The people of the Bible are in general more human than their counterparts in other mythologies, both literally and in the quality of their depictions.  Zeus and Apollo were gods.  Moses and Abraham were men, and as such, their stories are far more grounded, realistic, and relatable.  But there is no where that this is more evident than with Jesus himself.  Although he is the most divine person in the Bible, he is also, ironically, the most endearingly human.

It is as if, in driving home the point of Jesus' humanity, the writers of the Gospels were forced to really consider for the first time what those truly human qualities were.  Whether they were chronicling or manufacturing the details of Jesus' life, they were forced to break the mold of those old wooden archetypes.  As a result, the Jesus we read about in the Gospels has a substance, a vitality that the Greek, Roman, and Egyptian gods do not.  When he has to be woken from a nap when the disciples were afraid of the storm, it's oddly touching to thinking of Jesus taking naps.  When he turns water into wine, we want to consider him a friend.  We sympathize when he steadily maintains his patience in the face of Peter's continual lack of understanding.  We understand his fear and his ambivalence in the Garden of Gethsemane.  We feel his pain on the cross.

This is something we almost take for granted now, but at the time it was groundbreaking.  Not only the human character, but the human being, was seen in a new light.  Christianity gave rise to a concern for the individual soul and inner life that was unheard of before.  In telling this story of God walking among us as a man, and by considering in wonder the things that made him human, we became aware of ourselves for possibly the first time.  Even by the simple act of asking for something eat, Jesus Christ changed the world.      

13 comments:

  1. I often wonder if the follow up to the question of anyone having any food were, "I mean, because if not, you can...you know...eat me...I know that doesn't sound right now, but, trust me, it will catch on like pop rocks candy. What? Oh, they're little inventions that were thought to have exploded and maimed teens who chased them with cola...what? Oh, Cola is a soft...never mind. Now, pass that slice of bread and watch this miracle.

    ReplyDelete
  2. *sigh* What are we gonna do with you Scott? :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nice post here. I have to agree with you, I'm sure that his asking for food was included to drive home that he was human.
    I've always looked at the differences in the gospels not as discrepancies but rather what each writer felt was important to include. It's kind of like police talking to witnesses at a crime scene; some woman may have noticed the shoes worn by someone because of the designer. A man would totally ignore that and instead concentrated on the type of gun used or Reds hat that was being worn.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I wonder if this story illustrates a limitation on the powers of Mr. Jesu. He asked for food, instead of creating it. If I remember the story of feeding the multitudes, he didn't create food out of nothing then, either. He took a little and made it a lot. Same with the water into wine. The wine didn't just show up out of nowhere.

    If, after his three days, he had showed up and made steak out of grains of wheat for his dinner, it still would have showed his physical side, albeit not quite so subtly.

    Do any of the Biblical stories show him creating substance from nothing?

    ReplyDelete
  5. @George: I'll have to think about that. I seem to remember that some of the details weren't just different, but also contradictory, or at least they appeared to be. Anyway, like I said, I'll save that for another day.

    @Doug: I think you're right. He transformed and multiplied things, but I don't think they ever mention him making anything appear out nothing. Even when the Devil tempts him, he tells him to turn some stones into bread, rather than just make the bread materialize out of thin air.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The authors of the gospels are often depicted sitting in lonely caves scratching out their reminiscences. I firmly believe they all got together at some cozy local inn and compared notes but rarely agreed on anything. "Look at this story about Gilgamesh, man! Like, he was dead for a week and when he came back he created a river! Can you believe that stuff, man? A river! If I was dead for a week I'd want a pizza or something first, you know? Yeah, a pizza and a beer. Course, I'd be horny too. But let's not carry it too far."

    ReplyDelete
  7. :) Very funny.

    Yes there are many mythical antecedents to many Biblical stories. It seems as though they borrowed a little here, and a little there. Of course, those who subscribe to a literal interpretation of the Bible would counter that naturally variations of Biblical stories show up in other cultures because they're each based on a common event that actually happen; it just got distorted in the telling in these other cultures. So, for instance, when Gilgamesh talks to a snake just as Eve did, that's because the collective memory of the Eden incident had spread with the branching growth of the human race. I'm not saying I completely buy this argument, but I can admit that it has a certain logic to it.

    Considering instead that they did borrow these details, I think that their real contribution was still in their more grounded and human approach in their use of these details. Zeus was known to have fathered a child or two with human women, but it seems like lurid melodrama compared to the more humble and touchingly poignant story of Mary. Perhaps it's only my opinion and perspective on the matter, but it seems like the latter story has a depth and maturity that the former lacks.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I was very surprised that I'd get my lesson in Bible studies from you, Bryan, being pretty well clued up on it, despite the typo in your title.

    But now you've demonstrated this sensitivity and knowledge, I hope to get more of the same. Can you promise more essays on Biblical themes?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Arrgghh, a typo in the title. That's the worst. Unfortunately, I don't think spell-check works in that field for some reason.

    And yes, there most likely will be other posts on Biblical themes down the line. I can't say when exactly, but I'm sure there will be more. I grew up quite inundated in the subject.

    ReplyDelete
  10. You know, in some ways I think I preferred the old gods to this new one. They were more entertaining. They fought and schemed and wenched and partied and did horrible things to each other and the occasional mortal that got in their way. They behaved like spoiled teenagers. In a sense they were more... human.... than this new one. Even Jesus, who was reportedly human himself, rarely acted like one. Or if he did, they managed to strip most of that away with their creative editing of the bible.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Well, I guess it depends on what you consider human :)

    ReplyDelete
  12. Good post and yes they needed to bring it home he returned in the flesh but to ask for a meal is funny. A typical man. A women would have had to get her hair fixed or something after three days.

    Let's see what you can do with Mary Magdalene's story..Like to see you delve into that one a bit.

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...